<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Transformers &#8211; Revenge of the Fallen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vinko.com/2009/07/01/movie-review-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vinko.com/2009/07/01/movie-review-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=movie-review-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen</link>
	<description>Thoughts on technology consumables from a different angle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Niels Peen</title>
		<link>http://blog.vinko.com/2009/07/01/movie-review-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/#comment-17474</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Peen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vinko.com/?p=3296#comment-17474</guid>
		<description>My 2 cents:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The camera style is very fast and shaky combined with unexpected close ups. A trick to make things look more exciting, but heavily over done. Keeping track of who is who and understanding what you&#039;re seeing is almost tiring. A waste really, because it does seem like that the underlying CGI is in fact high quality stuff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure what the Megan Fox hype is about, she has terrible hands for a supposed &#039;next Angelina&#039; and her role didn&#039;t require much acting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, the movie stars a number of familiar faces, has some funny moments and is certainly not dull.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s Tuesday today, which means we saw it at half price. Just about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2 cents:</p>
<p>The camera style is very fast and shaky combined with unexpected close ups. A trick to make things look more exciting, but heavily over done. Keeping track of who is who and understanding what you&#39;re seeing is almost tiring. A waste really, because it does seem like that the underlying CGI is in fact high quality stuff. </p>
<p>Not sure what the Megan Fox hype is about, she has terrible hands for a supposed &#39;next Angelina&#39; and her role didn&#39;t require much acting.</p>
<p>That said, the movie stars a number of familiar faces, has some funny moments and is certainly not dull.</p>
<p>It&#39;s Tuesday today, which means we saw it at half price. Just about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 34/41 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: blog.vinko.com @ 2012-02-13 00:42:18 -->
